Do I Believe?
How to easily judge an on-screen performance
A really effective way of judging a performance to camera is to watch it with the sound turned down and ask yourself, “do I believe?” In doing so, you remove the dialogue (and almost always the narrative as well) from the equation and instead you have no choice but to focus instead on just the body language.
Really effective acting to camera is all about internalisation because, as in life, it’s what we think rather than what we actually say that is the majority of the message that we communicate. This is why we’re told by behavioural scientists that anything up to 80% of what we’re communicating is actually via body language.
If someone is “acting” then they will be forcing that body language and in doing so, their performance will appear forced or even fake.
In life, our emotions leak out of us in what are known as “micro-expressions”, tiny little expressions that dance across our face as we are talking and listening. These micro-expressions come from a place of truth and it’s super, super hard for us to knowingly fake them.
(More about micro expressions here ).
Consider the camera as a mute, passive and intimate observer to social interaction. It just sits there and watches….can’t add to the dialogue, can’t do anything, just watches and judges... As an acting exercise, sit in a coffee shop or bar and watch the way people are communicating. Don’t listen to what they are saying, just watch the body language. (You’re unlikely to be able to video these conversations but there are plenty of examples of documentaries on the internet of ordinary people taking without knowing that they are being filmed). Now go and look at any screen acting that you like, from monologues and self-tapes to big budget films and watch the scene with the sound turned off. As you watch, ask yourself, “do you believe?”
Self-tapes and monologues are nearly always performed to some eye-line off-camera, not direct down the barrel of the lens. So, before you submit that monologue or self-tape, watch it again with the sound turned off and ask yourself, “do you believe or is that person ACTING”. If you see the “acting” (what old-school BBC-trained Directors like me call “the wheels turning”) then you watching someone “act” not “believe” what they are doing. Re-shoot the monologue/self-tape and try to stop “acting” and start “believing” instead. The end results will be far more effective at encouraging your audience to suspend disbelief.
Incidentally, I was taught this technique many years ago at the very start of my directing career when I was being formally trained by the BBC. Back in those days, we shot on film (digital hadn't been invented yet) and this meant that the sound was always recorded separately (shooting on film meant that the camera with the film in it wasn't actually able to record sound at the same time. So the sound was always recorded separately and that's why we used clapperboards, even when shooting with just one camera, in order to provide a sync point for both sound and vision). Each night, the film rushes (that's the technical name for the exposed film that we'd shot during the day) would be sent away to the labs for overnight processing and the following morning, we'd start the day watching what were called "Dailies". In order to save time, it was standard practice NOT to dub the audio onto these dailies and so we'd be watching everything we'd shot the previous day mute (i.e. without any sound). Now remember the whole video playback thing hadn't also been invented yet so this would be the first time that you would actually see what the camera had seen.
By removing the sound, not only did we remove the dialogue but we also were able to focus completely on the physical performances of the actors and key to this was their body-language.
This technique worked so very well for years and years and kind of got forgotten when sync-sound became so readily available with digital playback.
If you don't believe me, consider this: I travel a lot and not always do I speak the language of wherever it is I am. However, I can function pretty well in nearly every social situation I find myself in, even if I don't know what on earth is being said, just by watching the body language of those around me.
Animals can read body language really well too. That's why some dogs growl at a stranger who approaches you as you're out walking your dog, or instead just wag their tail, even before that stranger has said a single word.
You can test out my theory by watching a foreign language film with the sound turned down. I guarantee you that if the acting is any good, you'll be able to make a good guess at the plot by just watching...
If you still don't believe me, as an experiment, next time you're asked to submit a self-tape, before you send it out, watch it back with the volume turned down and try REALLY hard to be objective. Don't see yourself on screen. Instead, pretend you don't know who is talking and what they are talking about. Then ask yourself "do I believe ?" Can you figure out the core emotions behind what is being said? Does the person talking express any micro-expressions or are the expressions forced or even unnatural? Then show it to someone you trust, someone who doesn't know the narrative of what you are performing, someone who hasn't just watched you tape that self-tape. Then ask them what do they think the core emotions of the performance are. Does that trusted person tell you the emotional arc you were trying to perform or not? Do they believe?
